- EBA – Art or science?
- Hello world…
- Let it go… and let it break
- Functional Dependency Map – Follow Up
- Analysts and architects
- Analysis and architecture
- Process or Capability Architecture
- The art of compromise: Designing deliverable architectures
- Business Architecture: How long?
- Help needed – How tactical should my architecture be?
- EBA and the Program Office
- Functional Dependency Map
- Processes are NOT part of a business architecture
- Business Architecture Briefings – Getting off on the right foot
- Capabilities and your roadmap
Category Archives: Controversial
…although I’m not sure whether anybody will be reading this. I can’t believe it’s nearly a year since I last posted here… *flaps a cloth around and sneezes at the disturbed dust* I first started this blog to help analyse … Continue reading
I guess our business is much like any enterprise in the sense that the pressure to find that extra saving, that extra efficiency is always present. When combined with the increasing sophistication of end user computing (EUC) tools this can … Continue reading
Note: I originally titled this post “Analysis vs. architecture” but deliberately changed it based on the tone of the post as it emerged. So, I’m not quite sure what inspired this post from Nick Malik but it certainly provoked reactions! Kevin … Continue reading
I recently had a chance to look into the detail of the P3O work being done by the Office for Government Commerce here in the UK. Now, while I don’t agree with everything they propose as best practice (more on … Continue reading
Well, there you go. I promised you some controversial views on this blog and here’s one of them. I believe that processes are NOT part of a business architecture model and here’s why. I strongly believe that business architecture models … Continue reading